Independent consumer resource. Always free, no sign up.
Text size: Family alerts
The Scam Exposed
Share
Scam Alerts

The 20 Area Codes Scam Callers Use Most: 2026 FTC Data

· · Updated · 4 min read
The 20 Area Codes Scam Callers Use Most: 2026 FTC Data

Scam callers do not pick their numbers at random. They pick area codes, and the ones they pick most are not the ones you would expect.

We looked at every phone number in our records against FTC Do Not Call complaint data, grouped by the area code the call came from. New York, Los Angeles and Houston are not in the top twenty. Tampa, rural West Virginia and western Kentucky are.

The 20 area codes with the most reported scam calls

Area code Region Numbers reported Complaints
813 Tampa, Florida 1,411 3,008
321 Brevard County and Orlando, Florida 680 2,495
304 West Virginia, statewide 1,210 2,424
270 Western Kentucky 1,195 2,377
903 Northeast Texas 997 2,352
502 Louisville, Kentucky 1,159 2,342
540 Western Virginia 1,020 2,192
520 Tucson, Arizona 992 2,069
405 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 925 1,953
423 Eastern Tennessee 842 1,890
470 Atlanta, Georgia 857 1,846
434 Central Virginia 919 1,841
850 Northwest Florida 715 1,789
804 Richmond, Virginia 872 1,778
708 Southern Chicago suburbs, Illinois 852 1,778
928 Northern and rural Arizona 876 1,772
904 Jacksonville, Florida 820 1,658
856 Southern New Jersey 731 1,636
774 Southeastern Massachusetts 752 1,616
815 Northern Illinois 808 1,576

What the list does not contain

No 212 or 917, New York City. No 213 or 310, Los Angeles. No 312, central Chicago. No 713, Houston. No 415, San Francisco.

Between them those area codes cover a large share of the American population, and none of them reaches the top twenty.

What does appear is a run of mid-size and rural regions. West Virginia's single statewide area code sits third. Western Kentucky is fourth. Northeast Texas is fifth. Eastern Tennessee, central Virginia, northern Arizona and northern Illinois are all in the list.

Why smaller area codes lead

Two things explain most of it.

Familiarity is the whole point. The technique known as neighbour spoofing works by showing a number that looks local to the person being called. In a large metro area a local number is ordinary and carries no weight. In a smaller region, a local prefix stands out as familiar, and answering rates go up.

Number availability. Blocks of numbers in high demand metro area codes are heavily used and more actively monitored. Less saturated area codes offer more unused numbers to rotate through, and rotation is essential once a number starts getting blocked.

The Florida entries are the exception in one sense and the rule in another. Tampa's 813 leads the whole list, and 321, 850 and 904 also appear, which puts four Florida area codes in the top twenty. Florida also reports more scam call complaints than any other state.

How to read the two columns

They measure different things and the gap between them is informative.

Numbers reported is how many separate phone numbers in that area code have at least one complaint against them. A high figure means many different numbers in rotation.

Complaints is the total number of consumer complaints logged against all of them.

Tampa's 813 has 1,411 numbers and 3,008 complaints, about 2.1 complaints per number. West Virginia's 304 has 1,210 numbers and 2,424 complaints, almost exactly 2.0. Brevard's 321 is different: 680 numbers but 2,495 complaints, which is 3.7 per number. Fewer numbers, each used far more heavily.

Method

Figures come from FTC Do Not Call complaint records combined with reports submitted by readers, covering the numbers held in our database as of September 2026.

Numbers are grouped by the area code of the phone number the complaint was made about, not by where the person receiving the call lives. A complaint against an 813 number may have come from a consumer anywhere in the country.

Toll free prefixes were excluded, specifically 800, 833, 844, 855, 866, 877 and 888. These are not tied to any geographic area, so including them would say nothing about regions. They do appear heavily in the underlying data.

Two limits are worth stating. A displayed area code is not proof of where a caller is, because caller ID can be set to any number. And complaint data reflects the people who report, so regions with higher reporting rates will appear higher regardless of actual call volume.

Using this data

These figures are free to cite with attribution to The Scam Exposed. Journalists and researchers who want the full breakdown by state, by month or by complaint category can request it at info@thescamexposed.com and we will send it as a spreadsheet at no cost.

To check a specific number against these records, use the lookup on our home page. It is free and takes about ten seconds.

What Do You Think?

No one has commented yet. If this happened to you as well, say so below. Knowing that other people had the same call makes it far easier for the next person to trust their instincts.

Add Your Comment

Every comment is read by a person before it appears, so it will not show up straight away. Never post your phone number, address, or bank details here.

This one question keeps the automatic spam out.

You're Safe Here. Let's Fix This Now.

If you already sent money or shared information, act fast. Follow these steps in order.

1

Call Your Bank or Card Company Immediately

Use the number on the back of your card, not any number the caller gave you. Ask them to freeze the transaction or account.

2

Call the National Elder Fraud Hotline

Free help, 7 days a week.

Call 1-833-372-8311
3

Report It to the Government

File a free report at the Federal Trade Commission so they can investigate.

Go to reportfraud.ftc.gov